New York Isn't Just New York Anymore
It has become a commonplace that new technologies overcome traditional
geographic boundaries by achieving communication electronically
rather than by face-to-face interaction. Because they permit the
dispersal of activities, new information technologies have largely
been seen as threats to the economic well-being of cities, rather
than as supportive and complementary communications sytems. As British
geographer Jean Gottmann has noted, "the basic question . . . is
whether in the present evolution toward an information society,
the gathering of people in cities is still necessary. As telecommunications
improve, could the massive and dense concentration in large urban
centres, and the nuisance this concentration entails, he done away
with and replaced by a scattered habitat held together by networks
of wires and cables?"(1)
The Telephone and the Skyscraper
Telecommunications technologies have clearly facilitated the movement
of economic activity out of cities. The telephone has enabled firms
to separate headquarters physically from manufacturing functions.
while still maintaining control over production. Communications
technologies enable firms to shift industrial activities to locations
where the costs of land, labour or raw materials are low while still
centralising command and coordination functions. For example, computer-aided
design permits fashion designers to work in mid-town Manhattan while
their products are manufactured in other parts of the United States
and in other countries.
The use of telecommunications systems to transmit messages over
long distances has not, however, reduced the value of the face-to-face
transactions that occur in the world's leading cities. Proximity
is still a vital element in corporate decision making. New communications
technologies have reinforced rather than weakened the importance
of information capitals. This paper examines the relationship of
telecommuni- cations to urban development, focusing upon events
and issues arising in the New York-New Jersey metropolitan region.
The role of telecommunications in the decentralisation of cities
has been given far more attention than the contribution of communications
technologies to the centralisation of economic functions. The telephone.
for example, was critical to the development of the tall office
building, the hallmark of architecture in central cities. Prior
to the telephone, human messengers were the primary means of bringing
information into and out ototfice buildings. As one observer wrote
in 1908, "Suppose there was no telephone and every message had to
be carried by a personal messenger. How much room do you think the
necessary elevators would leave for offices' Such structures [skyscrapers)
would he an economic impossibility."(2)
By allowing firms to enlarge their geographic and functional scale,
telecommunications has also reinforced the need for control and
coordination from a central managerial perspective. As firms become
larger and more diffuse in terms of goods and services. the need
for overall coordination also increases, and telecommunications
facilitates both processes. As Gottmann has argued, "the telephone's
impact on office location has thus been dual: first it has forced
the office from the previous necessity of locating next to the operations
it directed: second, it has helped to gather offices in large concentrations
in special areas."(3)
Telecommunications are a predominantly intra- urban and inter-urban
phenomenon. In 1977. the 16 largest metropolitan areas in the US
accounted for one-third of all interstate business message loll
service (MTS) and wide area toll service revenues. Furthermore,
the top 32 metropolitan areas were responsible for half of all such
revenues.(4) Telephone traffic demonstrates the intense communications
patterns among those metropolitan areas where the majority of individuals
and firms are located. Although hinterland areas have been made
more accessible with telecommunications, it is important to recognise
the urban basis of most telephone messages. Dale Hatfield, in testimony
to the US House of Representatives, has pointed out that "Most business
machine communications travel only a short distance. Only about
8% of communications traffic travels more than 500 miles. Thirty
two percent travels between facilities less than 500 miles apart.
The remaining 60o is intrafacility."
A strong case can be made that telecommunications serve both centralising
and decentralising functions. The conventional wisdom that telecommunications
are a substitute for human physical interaction ignores the fact
that telecommunications and transport are mutually-reinforcing systems.
In a study after the energy crisis of 1973, the late Ithiel de Sola
Pool found that when air travel was reduced, so was telephone traffic.
Indeed, it has been sungested that "telecommunications, at the very
least complements rather than substitutes for the physical movement
of people. Indeed, it is not unlikely that one stimulates the other
and that they may have a symbiotic relationship."(5)
Advanced communications systems will become even more significant
for cities, such as New York and London, that have undergone the
transition from an industrial to an information economy. For example.
New York City's economic strength is derived from the ability of
its individuals and firms to connect bits of information into profit-making
services and to produce decisions that result in the production
of goods and services across the globe. During the past 25 years.
New York City's economy has shifted from one of production and handling
of goods (i.e., manufacturing, trade and transport) to an economy
characterised by the prominence of information-handling activities.
In 1958, the information sector, which comprises 18 of the 51 private
non-agricultural industries, accounted for 35% of the city's private
employment. By 1982, the information sector had grown to 54% of
the city's private employment. Furthermore, the information sector
accounted for 41% of the city's income in 1958 and 56% of the city's
value added in 1982. These figures do not include federal, state
and local government which also have a high information component.
Banking, securities and business services together accounted for
almost 23% of total city value added in 1982, more than double that
in 1958. Information handling and processing activities are the
fastest growing sectors of the city's economy.
In an information-based economy, the economic viability of a city
depends upon its communications infrastructure: its ability to send.
receive and process messages. New York City's growth as an information
capital has been made possible, in part. by the advent of telecommunications
systems which allow financial and other headquarters functions to
be concentrated in the Manhattan central business district and facilitate
the dispersal of manufacturing and sales activities. While goods-related
activities such as manufacturing may occur outside the central business
district (in the outer boroughs, elsewhere in the region and around
the world), key decisions about those activities are nonetheless
made within New York's corporate headquarters complex. Thus, the
capacity to transmit information efficiently and rapidly in, through
and out of the city is vital to the city's economic well-being.
Information is the engine that drives the city's economy and generates
demand for a sophisticated and advanced telecommunications plant.
New York City is currently the leading U.S. departure point for
international communications traffic. In 1982, New York City alone
accounted for more than 20% of all overseas message units emanating
from the U.S. (this excludes calls to Mexico and Canada).
| Table 1: Overseas Message Units (1982) |
|
Area Code
|
Units |
| New York City - 212 |
22,718,027 |
| Los Angeles - 213 |
9,310,028 |
| San Francisco - 415 |
4,535,474 |
| Chicago - 312 |
4,028,709 |
| Northern New Jersey - 201 |
4,639,122 |
| Connecticut - 203 |
2,129,146 |
Westchester, Putnam, Orange and
Rockland Counties, NY - 914 |
1,879,576 |
| Nassau-Suffolk, Long Island, NY -516 |
1,705,740 |
|
Total (USA):
|
115,001,763 |
|
| Source: AT&T Communications |
More than twice as many overseas message units were generated by
New York City as by Los Angeles. When New York City, northern New
Jersey, Long Island and the four New York State counties to the
north of New York City are added together, the New York metropolitan
region accounted for almost 30% of the nation's overseas message
units.
New York City's predominance as an international financial centre
is reflected in the fact that in the decade from 1972 to 1982, the
number of foreign banks with offices in New York has doubled to
336. The concentration of information and financial service firms
in New York City has led to the development of a diverse set of
telecommunications facilities and services. The city's central business
district represents the equivalent of a "telecommunications park"
with extensive webs of coaxial cable, optical fibre, and readily
available microwave transmission facilities. It is the only city
in the US with coaxial cable extending through the central business
district, an optical fibre link running on the perimeter of the
central business district, and a planned optical fibre link to a
major communication satellite and office park project.
New York City has more telephones than any other city in the US
or Europe, and there are more word processors in Manhattan than
in all of Western Europe. New York City's two cable television systems
are among the largest systems in the country with a combined total
of over 225,000 subscribers. One New York cable operator, Manhattan
Cable TV, is a leader in the use of cable for two-way data transmission
for corporate and government applications.
| Table 1: Overseas Telephone Traffic From New York City
(1982) |
|
Destination
|
Percentage |
| United Kingdom |
37.4% |
| France |
11.9% |
| Italy |
9.5% |
| Germany, FR |
9.3% |
| Israel |
6.6% |
| Switzerland |
6.4% |
| Japan |
5.3% |
| Colombia |
5.0% |
| Greece |
4.5% |
| Brazil |
4.3% |
|
| Source: AT&T Communications |
New York Telephone's recently completed 48,000-circuit optical
fibre ring around Manhattan (RAM) links 12 major switching centres
in Manhattan. The dominance of information handling activities in
the New York City economy, the advent of communications deregulation,
and the dynamic state of telecommunications technology will generate
even further changes in the city's telecommunications infrastructure
over the next decade.
New York City is also the key link in several new inter-city fibre
optic networks including AT&T's fibre link to Washington, D.C.,
and MCI's planned fibre route from New York to Miami. In addition,
New York City's extensive terrestrial microwave facilities include
systems used for broadcast television networking and for relays
to satellite earth stations outside the city. Microwave technology
is also being used for intra-city communications services such as
microwave multipoint distribution services and cellular mobile radio
services.
New York is also the centre of the nation's broadcasting industry.
The three major television networks headquartered here reach over
96% of US households. The 36 local radio stations and nine local
broadcast television stations serve over eight million households
- the largest broadcast market in the US. In addition to its role
as the leading site for the production of television advertising,
industrial films and corporate video. New York is rapidly becoming
a major production centre for cable TV programming. Many cable television
programming services are based in the city as are two leading multiple
systems operators.
Two major satellite projects, the Teleport in Staten Island, N.Y.,
and the Hughes Spring Creek satellite station in Brooklyn, N.Y.,
will add dramatically to the number of satellite earth stations
in New York City and assured unparalleled access to communication
satellites for New York City firms. Moreover, a new generation of
communication satellites employing the ku-hand will also greatly
increase the number of salrilitc-acressible sites within the city.
Integrated Telecommunications
Several major firms have built or are in the process of building
their own telecominunications systems to serve local and regional
communications needs within the New York-New Jersey region. Enhanced
telecommunications infrastructure "can he used by a developer to
attract tenants and to generate additional revenues, by marketing
such services as video security monitoring, teleconferencing, high-speed
data channels, and satellite television distribution - all carried
on a coaxial cable or fibre optic local area network."(6) Office
buildings, for example, are being designed to provide advanced telecommunications
infrastructure for integrated video, voice and data services.
Citicorp has created a metropolitan network called Micronet, which
links five Manhattan sites by optical fibre or microwave. There
is also a link to Citicorp's satellite network. Micronet offers
advanced voice, video and data services and is being marketed within
Citicorp and to other corporate users as well. Olympia & York
own and manage more than 14 million rentable square feet of prime
office space in New York City. By 1985 they will have another 10
million square feet in major complexes in New York City and throughout
the U.S. O&Y recently formed a joint venture with United Telecommunications,
the second largest US non-Bell telephone company, and together they
are developing a network that will link each O&Y office complex.
The O&Y network will offer advanced telecommunications services
such as electronic mail. teleconferencing and high-speed data transmission
to small and medium sized tenants: services that are currently available
to large corporations only.
In midtown Manhattan, United Technologies is installing an optical
fibre cable in Tower 49, an office building located at 49th Street
between Fifth Avenue and Madison Avenue. Tenants will be able to
engage United Technologies to provide telephones, electronic mail
and other telecommunications services. Satellite Business Systems
(SBS), a joint venture of Comsat, Aetna and IBM has formed SBS Real
Estate Communications Corporation (Relacom) to market telecommunications
services to real estate developers and owners while AT&T and
United Technologies are engaged in a joint venture to provide communications
services to commercial buildings and tenants. For existing office
buildings, a major challenge involves the installation of advanced
communications services. Duct space for new coaxial cable or optical
fibre is often limited in older buildings and the cost of rewiring
office structures can be very high.
Twenty-Four Hour Operations
The enormous capital investment in computer and communications
equipment in conjunction with the international character of New
York's financial operations has led many institutions to run their
operations on a 24 hour basis. A facility which operates round the
clock requires access by safe and reliable transport on a 24 hour
basis as well. Although New York's mass transit system runs 24 hours
a day, several mass transit lines are not perceived to be safe after
daytime hours. By contrast, suburban locations are accessible by
car and equipped with private parking facilities. Large financial
institutions in lower Manhattan currently pay the cab fare home
for employees who work late in the evening. This reflects the limited
commuter rail and subway service at off- peak times, and highlights
the flexibility of automobile travel for access to round-the-clock
facilities.
The growing use of telecommunications technologies in finance,
insurance, real estate and services is of particular importance
for the location of hack office operations in the New York-New Jersey
metropolitan region. Back office operations typically include cheque
processing, security processing and clearance, claims payment, and
other support services. Back office operations which once were defined
by their lack of direct client contact, now include customer service
operations that provide telephone- based contact with bank and credit
card customers. Certain banks and credit card companies, in fact.
use back office rather than front office personnel to handle routine
enquiries and information requests. Back office personnel are equipped
with computer terminals that allow them to carry out more functions
and with greater speed than tellers or other managerial personnel.
Each sector of the financial resource industry handles back office
activities differently. Insurance carriers, for example, have evolved
from labour intensive to capital intensive industries and have typically
established large regional processing centres across the country.
In 1983, New York City insurance carriers accounted for 74,000 employees,
the securities industry for 100,000 and banking for 173,000.
Dispersal of Back Offices
The back office operations of the major securities firms have traditionally
been situated in lower Manhattan, near the New York and American
Stock Exchanges. The back office operations of New York City's large
commercial banks - Chemical, Chase Manhattan and Manufacturer's
Hanover - have long been located on Long Island, while Citicorp
has back office facilities in South Dakota and Florida, as well
as in New York City and on Long Island. As banks, brokerage firms,
and insurance companies become integrated national operations, the
distinctions among them will fade. As a result, the location of
their back office operations may increasingly be dispersed across
the country rather than being based in New York City or the surrounding
region.
The major factors that influence the location of back office operations
in New York City are:
- the costs of occupancy.
- labour skills needed.
- taxes and transport.
- the technological requirements.
The average office employee occupies approxi- mately 150 square
feet: the cost of space in New York's central business district
has risen from $10 (£7.60) a square foot in 1974 to approximately
$40 (£30.50) a square foot in 1984. The clerical worker who required
$1,500 worth of space in 1974 requires $6,000 (£4,600) worth of
space in 1984. Although Manhattan is the preferred location for
many back office operations, it is possible to obtain equivalent
office space at almost half the cost on Long Island and in New Jersey.
Thus, as leases expire (and approximately 10-15% of office leases
expire annually), firms are considering alternative locations where
rents are cheaper than Manhattan's prime office space.
One of New York City's traditional assets has been access to an
enormous, skilled workforce. As back office operations have been
transformed from paper to electronic systems, the requisite labour
skills have been upgraded. The ability to gain access to an educated
female suburban workforce has been one factor contributing to the
movement out of cities. College-educated women seeking part- and
full-time employment close to their homes are a significant part
of the suburban back office workforce. In addition. certain employers
deliberately do not concentrate large numbers of clerical workers
in one location for fear of unionisation.
The mass transit system which links New York City's central business
district to the outer boroughs and the rest of the metropolitan
region is a powerful advantage in attracting a skilled and diverse
workforce in Manhattan. However, breakdowns, delays and safety on
the region's mass transit system pose genuine impediments to attracting
and retaining back office employment in New York City.
Finally, commercial banks in New York City are subject to a combined
city and state tax rate on earnings of 24.23%. This rate exceeds
that of every other state and is especially high in comparison with
Delaware's 2% to 6% tax rate. Although New York holding companies
have established banking subsidiaries in Delaware, only a modest
portion of their operations have been transferred to Delaware so
far. However, it is possible that once such banking subsidiaries
are successfully established in Delaware. additional banking activities
will be transferred. There are approximately 400 million square
feet of office space in the tri-state region, consisting of New
York City. Westchester and Rockland Counties in New York State,
Fairfield County, Connecticut and nine New Jersey counties. Approximately
280 million square feet are in New York City and 120 million in
the surrounding region.
Manhattan West
Within this region, there is considerable diversity and specialisation.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Fairfield County, Connecticut
and Westchester County, New York were perceived to be the threats
to the corporate headquarters located in New York City. During the
same period, Nassau and Suffolk Counties on Long Island blossomed
as back office sites for the large commercial banks, many of which
then functioned under New York State charters. Today, New Jersey
is regarded as the threat to the New York City back office market.
New Jersey's riverfront communites of Jersey City, Weehauken, and
Hoboken, are currently the sites for large scale office and commercial
development. Commercial real estate development in these communities
builds upon several distinctive advantages:
- relatively low cost energy and construction.
- good automobile and commuter rail access to Manhattan.
- close proximity to Newark International Airport.
- access to a diverse, affordable housing market in New Jersey.
- spectacular waterfront vistas of New York City.
The Mayor of Jersey City has referred to his commu- nity as New
York's "sixth borough" while real estate advertisements label Hoboken
as "Manhattan West." On the other side of the East River, back office
sites in downtown Brooklyn offer close proximity to tower Manhattan,
subway and commuter rail linkages. access to a large labour force,
and the availability of two sources of electrical energy.
Rather than being viewed as a threat to New York City. the proposed
office developments in New Jersey may more accurately reflect the
strength of the New York-New Jersey region and the strong market'
preference for office locations close lo the Manhattan central business
district.
Few cities approach the scale and scope of New York City's information
sector, but the issues and policies confronting the New York metropolitan
region are similar to those which other urban regions must address.
Major cities in the U.S., Western Europe and Asia are actively involved
in considering the use of telecommuncations as an economic development
tool. Anne W. Branscomb has discussed the possibility that communications
technologies will be the focal point for future urban growth: "The
cities of the future may cluster around satellite 'up links' rather
than at the mouth of rivers. Alternatively, small low-cost satellite
saucers may free populations from the cluster syndrome and equalise
communications opportunities for rural residents. The industrial
parks of the future may advertise free satellite saucers rather
than railroad spurs as a major attraction - especially since they
are more likely to be "communications campuses" rather than industrial
parks."(7)
The experience of New York City highlights the strategic relationship
between telecommunications and urban economic life. New York City
is clearly the financial and information capital of the US. It is
the headquarters of 72 of the Fortune 500 largest industrial
firms. 11 of the nation's 50 largest commercial banks, 14 of the
nation's 50 biggest diversified financial firms and six of the 'big
eight' accounting firms. Moreover. New York's 11 largest commercial
banks control 42% of the assets of the nation's largest banks. These
information-intensive businesses generate demands for new and more
specialised forms of voice, data and video communications. An elaborate
telecommunications infrastructure has been created to provide high-speed
communications within office buildings located in Manhattan's central
business district; to permit corporate coordination of dispersed
manufacturing and back office facilities; and to link New York City
with international capital markets round the clock.
The design, construction, and operation of this network of wires,
cable ducts, pitches, repeaters, structures and channels has largely
been the work of tly private sector, with local government playing
a passive or reactive role. New York City's primary involvement
with telecommunications has been as a regulator of cable television.
Ttie city's influence over other communications systems occurs indirectly.
through its land use regulations, building codes, and tax policies.
As telecommunications have become a pervasive factor in the city's
economy and in the provision of public services, the public sector
is taking a more active role in fostering the development of new
telecommunications systems. After several years of planning, the
municipal government has authorised the construction of 70-channel
cable systems in the four outer boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, Staten
Island and the Bronx. These cable systems will include an institutional
cable designed to serve public agencies and businesses. The City
of New York and the Port Authority are also involved in a joint
venture with the private sector to build the Teleport on Staten
Island which will consist of 17 satellite dishes, an office park
and optical fibre link lo New York and New Jersey.
The public sector has become a major user, regulator, and developer
of communications facilities in the New York-New Jersey region.
Perhaps the greatest challenge for local and regional agencies will
be the deployment of new telecommunications technologies to improve
the productivity of public services. New York City, for example,
leases 2,000 telephone lines for traffic signalisation; alternative
technologies are available to do the same job at lower cost.
New telecommunications technologies are transforming the function,
but not the form. of the New York-New Jersey metropolitan region.
Communications technologies alone are not responsible for decisions
by individuals or firms on where to locate. New telecommunications
technologies reinforce existing economic forces and preferences
for centralisation and decentralisation. Much of our thinking about
telecommunications technologies ignores the existing social, economic
and organisational constraints within which new technologies are
used. The strength of the New York- New Jersey region is increasingly
linked to the application of new computer and information technologies
in the service and financial sectors. Such technologies are enhancing
New York City's role as an international information centre while
contributing to the dispersal of routine office functions to other
parts of the region and the nation.
References
1. Jean Goltrnann, 'Megalopolis and Antipolis: The Telephone and
the Structure ot the City', in Ithiel de Sola Pool. ed. The Social
Impact of the Telephone. MIT Press. 1977, p. 306.
2. Ithiel de Sola Pool, Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective
Technology Assessment. Ablex, Norwood. New Jersey, 1983. p.
43
3. Gottmann, Ibid, p. 311.
4. John Lungdale, "Competition in the United States' Long- Distance
Telecommunications Industry," in Regional Studies. Vol. 17.
no. 6, p. 398.
5. Thomas Mandeville. "The Spatial Effects of Information Technology,"
in Futures. Vol. 15. no. 1. February 1983, p. 66.
6. Walter S. Baer. "Telephone and Cable Companies: Rivals or Partners
in Video Distribution." Times Mirror. March 1984.
7. Anne W. Branscomb, "Beyond Deregulation: Designing the Information
Infrastructure," in The Information Socieiy Journal. Vol.
1. no. 3. 1982. pp. 182-185.
Originally published in Intermedia
Volume 12, Number 4/5, July/Sept. 1984.